Shubho Muharat (2003) [Film Review]

Shubho Muharat;or, How valuable is the last autograph?
This week’s review shall be a bit different for we’ll take a look at a Bengali movie that is a free adaptation of one of Agatha Christie’s(!) crime stories, entitled The Mirror Crack’d From Side to Side.
Release Info
Directed by: Rituparno Gosh Starring: Rakhee, Sharmila Tagore, Nandita Das
Language: Bengali English Title: The First Shoot  Movie Industry: Tollywood Runtime: 157 min
Plot
The story centres on two movie actresses, Kakoli (Kalyani Mandal) and Padmini (Sharmila Tagore) who establish a really strong and intimate friendship over the course of their careers. Padmini is a retired NRI (Non Indian Resident) who lives in the United States, but she returns to Calcutta to help her husband in preparations for a new film in which Kakoli is to be the leading heroine. During the Mahurat ceremony (held to celebrate the start of making a film) somebody poisons Kakoli’s drink and the actress dies at her home while giving an interview to a young journalist Milli (Nandita Das). In spite of on-going police involvement, Milli’s aunt, Ranga Pishima (Rakhee), becomes greatly interested in the case and starts her own investigation.
The pain in the neck that is adapting Christie’s work
Unlike some people out there, who memorised all the books and saw all the adaptations, I am not a die-hard Agatha Christie fan, but I do prefer her works over the ones of Arthur Conan Doyle (sorry Sherlock...). After reading her books and also checking out such famous series as Poirot or Miss Marple, I came to the conclusion that the key to a proper transposition of Christie’s crime story to the screen lies in appropriate reflection of the whole mood of the story, without necessarily strict reliance on the main plot itself. What I mean is that Christie’s novels are not just “whodunits”, but they are also, in a way, psychological dramas. In contrast to Conan Doyle where we get of course the thrill of unravelling the mystery, in Christie we can experience the game of shadows between the detective and the murderer; the toxic relationship which the two fall into and finally end up revealing themselves in the final confrontation. In the view of such a perspective on Christie’s works, I dare to think that Shubho Muharat is one of the best adaptations, if not indeed, the best one ever. 
Indian Miss Marple
While watching this movie, I remember years ago seeing a TV adaptation of this particular story with Joan McKenzie in the leading role and disliking it. Back then, everything seemed a bit forced and pretentious, starting from the screenplay and finishing on the acting. It’s no wonder that the show went on hiatus for 4 years. With the progress of the series, Miss Marple transformed herself from witty and charming into a bland, dull, and slightly annoying lady. Needless to say, seeing Miss Marple in an “Indian take” is extremely refreshing. Contrary to the literary progenitor, Ranga Pishima is not a spinster, or at least claims not to be for she mentions having grown-up children; moreover, she does not live alone but with her niece who is constantly on the job and, on top of that, she loves watching movies on TV and is a cat lover. Quite a distant image of the sharp-minded amateur detective, isn’t it? Well, in fact, Ranga is not a detective at all. She uses her abilities of exceptional memory, observance, and outstanding deduction in every-day superficial matters like recovering a lost phone number, or catching her niece smoking red-handed. She is a woman who feels good in the seclusion of her own home, barely going out anywhere.
Strangely enough, such a diversity of traits actually works well together. The Indian Miss Marple seems more compassionate, more relatable, and more... ordinary in comparison to her literary original. Thus, it is much more interesting seeing her putting together the pieces of a puzzle, struggling to discover the truth, and finally facing the murderer in probably the most touching and emotionally purifying confrontation ever!
Again, Indian Miss Marple is not a detective, she is like an everyday mother, grandmother, aunt, or neighbour who does not seek the ultimate justice on the wrongdoer, but instead, she employs her exceptional abilities just for the fun of solving the problem and because there is a an opportunity to do so. Therefore, in my book, Ranga Pishima outranks Miss Marple.
Backdrops
In terms of disadvantages, there is very little of them and they do not ruin the reception of the film. However, some might feel put off by several sub-plots interrelated with the main crime, like a hair-dresser experiencing a twisted romance and trying to sabotage the murderer, or Milli being emotionally torn between two men, a police officer and her fellow photographer. Due to all that the movie lasts almost 160 min but it still feels like just a two-hour story.
So what it is in the end? Whodunit or psychological thriller?
I think that the movie is crafted so well that every viewer can perceive it differently. Those unfamiliar with Christie can fully (and naively) enjoy the main murder plot and those who are more perceptive, and can guess who the murderer is, can divert their attention to the Indian context of the story taking place in Calcutta, within the uninviting and demanding world of the movie industry. Personally, I think of this movie as a sort of emotional and sensual story, with a crime just in the background, focusing on such universal issues as parental love, revenge, admiration, and solitude. In addition, the supporting role of Sharmila Tagore cannot go unnoticed. Indian Sophia Loren again shines on screen not only with her beauty, but also with top-notch acting.
Recommendations
I would recommend this movie to anyone who likes crime stories, Agatha Christie, or just wants to watch a rather peaceful story without endless explosions of wild action or unexpected plot twists, but with a huge catharsis in the end. All in all, it is a well written and brilliantly acted motion picture. Gotta love Tollywood!
My personal score: 9/10

Samurai I- Musashi Miyamoto (1954) [Film Review]

Samurai I- Musashi Miyamoto; or, How to Lose a Friend and Alienate Villagers
Toshiro Mifune once again plays a part of ultra-cool badass samurai who does not frig about and makes some serious ass kicking in this entry of the samurai genre, but this time, without Akira Kurosawa at the directorial helm.
Release Info
Directed by: Hiroshi Inagaki Starring: Toshiro Mifune, Kaoru Yachigusa, Rentarō Mikuni, Mitsuko Mito
Language: Japanese Original Title: Miyamoto Musashi Runtime: 93 min
Plot
The movie opens with two friends in their native village on the brink of the civil war in Japan at the very end of the 16th century. Miyamoto Musashi (Toshiro Mifune), also known as Takezo, and his loyal comrade Matahachi (Rentarō Mikuni) leave the idyllic country lifestyle and join the army. However, after the decisive Battle of Sekigahara, the forces in which two men fought get decimated and they become outlaws on the run. Takezo and Matahachi seek refuge with a lonely widow Oko (Mitsuko Mito) and her daughter Akemi (Mariko Okada) who deal with robbing dead samurai of their valuables. The widow, due to skilful manipulation and ruthless advances, beguiles Matahachi and persuades him to accompany both women on their journey with stolen gold to Kyoto. Abandoned and devastated Takezo rushes back to his home village to let know Matahachi’s fiancée, Otsu (Kaoru Yachigusa), of his friends true fate. Yet, he does not know that his fiery attitude will cause a lot of trouble, both for him and poor Otsu.
A different Samurai film
Samurai I- Musashi Miyamoto, as you may have rightly deduced is the first instalment of a trilogy treating about the life of a real samurai figure who lived between the 16th and the 17th century in Japan. By many historians and modern experts, Miyamoto is considered to have been the greatest of all samurai, with his morbid quest encompassing dozens of epic duels in which he was never defeated. Such an interesting character seems to be awesome material to make a trilogy about; however, if you are used to Kurosawa’s style of moviemaking, prepare in advance for something totally different.
Mifune’s Miyamoto is not Mifune’s Yojimbo
First of all, the movie directed by Hiroshi Inagaki, was shot in colour, which was quite uncommon for Japanese pictures in the 1950s. As a result, the whole “ancient feeling” of the presented story triggered off by black-and-white picture in such samurai masterpieces as Harakiri (1962), Samurai Rebellion (1967), or Sanjuro (1963) is lost completely. But on the other hand, the viewers have the ability to fully appreciate the outdoor settings and costumes, which, in case of this trilogy, are awesome.
In addition, the music score is quite different from other standard, eerie, samurai music tracks. Music composed by Ikuma Dan has quite of a Western feeling in itself. The grandeur of the main theme slightly reminded me of such classic as The Magnificent Seven (1960), which is a good thing, considering that Samurai I is kind of a coming-of-age story, a quest of self-exploration, full of dangers and adventures.
This brings me to the final factor that distinct this film from other samurai flicks. Namely, the storyline. If you expect some action-packed/justice for all revenge type of narrative, go and watch Goyokin (1969) with Tatsuya Nakadai instead. In Musashi Miyamoto, you won’t get to see sophisticated samurai duels (these take place in the sequels). The first part, however, is kind of a soap opera set in ancient Japan. Takezo is an overconfident rookie who slashes his opponents with meat slicer, which turns the whole village against him. It seems as if all people around Takezo are evil by default, but Musashi himself is not a righteous hero. He means well, but often use of his sword rather than intellect results in disastrous consequences. The head of the village wants him dead, the distant relatives want him dead, Matahachi’s mother wants him dead; even the Buddhist monk (initially sympathetic to Takezo) also thinks that sufficient punishment for his mischief is death. The only person who is a clearly positive figure is Otsu. She is the only one who pities Takezo, frees him from the villagers’ imprisonment, and eventually falls in love with him. Only at the end of the picture, Takezo comes to reason and begins his proper samurai training in Himeji Castle, setting the scene for Part II.
Recommendations
If you want to check out something completely out of the ordinary with Toshiro Mifune, this is a movie for you. However, if you are a fan of Kurosawa or Kobayashi’s samurai films, you might feel disappointed. Personally, the only odd thing I found about this movie is that it won the Honorary Academy Award for outstanding foreign language film, yet in the year of its release, two other, much more epic, Toho classics hit the screens (Gojira and Seven Samurai). All in all, Samurai I- Musashi Miyamoto is a well-made movie in its own right and the sequels (to be reviewed soon) only surpass its greatness.
Overall score: 7/10

Her Fatal Ways II (1991) [Film Review]

Her Fatal Ways II- And hilarity followed with her
Fearless and overconfident PRC’s devotee Inspector Shih-Nan returns in this priceless sequel to do what she does best- causing raging chaos of comical situations wherever she goes!
Release Info
Directed by: Alfred Cheung Starring: Carol Dodo Cheng, Waise Lee, Alfred Cheung
Language: Cantonese Original Title: Biao ji, ni hao ye! xu ji Movie Industry: Hong Kong Runtime: 96 min
Plot
The movie opens with Shih-Nan (Carol Cheng) as a decorated and promoted police instructor in Mainland China, educating young recruits in terms of fluency in foreign languages, martial arts, and the ability to see through the walls, even though she herself has no experience of such things. Her loyal nephew and confused as always, Sheng (Alfred Cheung), is still working with her, and to the pair joins another “expert” who is a kung-fu guide called Tiger Hsu (Michael Wong). The team ends up investigating a murder case which leads them back to Hong Kong in order to unravel the triad’s black market for smuggling weaponry. What could possibly go wrong on such a mission?
A decent sequel
To be honest, this was the very first film from “Her Fatal Ways” series that I was able to get my hands on and from the very first scene of “learning English” till the showdown with “mentally controlled bullets,” I was genuinely chuckling and laughing. In comparison with modern comedy crap that gets a wide release (and I mean not only American flicks, but also, Polish comedies, have a habit of sucking big time too) the movie is really funny. It is a light-hearted comedy and it does its job flawlessly.
Cheng again does one heck of an acting job with her performance, but the rest of the cast (from supporting to really minor roles) is not lagging behind either. Scenes with Alfred Cheung using “ExtraSensory Perception” are laughable and the case is the same with the sleepwalking Wu (Waise Lee), a HK officer collaborating with Shih-Nan on the investigation.
Drawbacks
In terms of disadvantages, there’s nothing worth mentioning; except maybe the love subplot between Shih-Nan and Wu that goes totally nowhere, but still, this is like a small pseudo-theme of each movie and the issue was also self-referenced in the subsequent sequel. However, if one wants to add a romantic undertone into a movie and make it pointless at the very end, why bother employing it in the first place?
Apart from that issue, the movie is highly enjoyable. We’ve got Shih-Nan’s continuous tirades in praise of communism and the proletariat’s glory, slapstick humour, karaoke singing, and a triad shootout. What more can you ask for?
Recommendations
I safely recommend this particular film to anyone who wants to have a good laugh. The movie has no explicit content and it can be enjoyed with family members as well as a bunch of friends. However, if the mockery of cultural differences and stereotypes is not your cup of tea, then you may want to watch something else. All in all, the movie’s fun!
Overall score: 7/10